The G-Log

Part 2 

Madison square park

   

Comments [0]

Caption Contest Friday: Anyone Missing An Intern? - Dealbreaker - A Wall Street Tabloid - Business News Headlines and Financial Gossip

Comments [0]

Messing with scammers

A couple of weeks ago I posted an ad on Craig's List seeking a studio or 1BR apartment in a few very popular/expensive neighborhoods (Union Square, East Village, Chelsea, Gramercy, etc.) in Manhattan. For those areas, my $1700/month budget is pretty low and would normally get me a somewhat livable studio apartment in a walk up building. Maybe a 1BR if I'm really lucky. And there would probably be a one-month broker's fee on top of that, even in this economy, if I want a place that's close to the subway.

So far, half of the responses I have received have been from scammers. I figured since they are wasting my time, I might as well waste theirs too. The email thread below is one of those exchanges. Unfortunately, I never heard back from this person again. 

Start from the bottom, then go up.

Enjoy :)

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Gary  wrote:
Sure, I understand.

I have a few more questions. Is there a swimming pool in the building? How about maid service? Is continental breakfast included in the rent? I have a pony, so it would be great if there's a stable near the building.

Also, I'm not familiar with the area so can you please tell me what bars/restaurants are near the apartment? What stores are near the apartment? Is there a Wal-Mart nearby? How about In'n'Out? Are there any Nigerian restaurants near the apartment because I love Nigerian food.

Please let me know. Thanks.

Gary 


On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Marguerite Phillipines <magphill53@yahoo.com> wrote:
Thanks for prompt response.Am willing to proceed to the viewing whenever suit you,but that will be after have seen the financial proof that you're really interested and up to the task of renting the room due to my past experience with non-serious people that have come across in the past and i won't like to go through that anymore which i hope you will understand?So get back to me asap in other to proceed.Thanks

--- On Sun, 7/26/09, Gary wrote:


From: Gary
Subject: Re: $1700 Professional seeking studio/1BR for September move-in (Union Square)
To: "Marguerite Phillipines" <magphill53@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, July 26, 2009, 3:11 PM

That sounds great. I'm very interested. When can I see the apt?

On Jul 26, 2009, at 5:08 AM, Marguerite Phillipines <magphill53@yahoo.com> wrote:

Hello Gary,
Thanks so much for the signifying your interest in my vacant apt in New York, i so much appreciate it and i'll be able to give your more details about it.the apt are fully furnished, all the bill are included, gas, electricity, water, telephone, Internet wireless.

 The apartment is located at 145 East 15th Street,manhattan new york 10003.the apt is available from July 2009 so once we have get concluded i will be able to reserve it till when moving in, the room has a very bid bed that can sleep two people with a television connected to cable,a small refrigerator apart from a big freezer in the kitchen a private bathroom with toilet drawer,however the apartment itself has the following for your benefit:a big living room fully furnished with a television connected to cable,internet facility available.apartment located on the ground floor. Comprising fitted kitchen with appliances, lounge with feature fireplace, double bedrooms with fitted cupboards and brand new fully tiled  bathroom with bath and shower. Gas central heating. Stripped wood floors & tiled floor surfaces throughout. Rent to include all bills. Situated close to an excellent selection of shops, bars and restaurants in New York ..The rent is $1700. and $1000. for the refundable security deposit,

 I've attached to the mail some pictures of the flat and i hope that you will love it?If you are willing to proceed,I'll be sending to you  a  rental agreement form to see what next to do.. Thanks while waiting to read from you.
Regards,
Marguerite Phillipines


<Bedroom--------.JPG>
<Bathroom.jpg>
<the kitchen.jpg>
<living_ room.jpg>
<living_room2.jpg>


 

         

Comments [2]

Test

Comments [1]

WTF???

So I'm online chatting with a friend who's had one year of post-baccalaureate pre-med classes in LA and is now in China doing some internship that his doctor dad had hooked him up with at a hospital. I thought it was just him in the surgery room observing a little operation here and there, but it turns out to be much more mind-blowing than I ever expected. 

Good God. I hope I never have to get anything major done in China. 

Gary says:why do you want to be a doctor?
Friend says:i like to touch people's heart
Friend says:literally
Gary says:you want to be a heart surgeon?
Friend says:yeah
Friend says:i have touched three people's heart already
Friend says:one just died two days ago, only 24 years old
Gary says:what were you doing touching someone's heart? are you allowed to do that?
Friend says:yeah just to feel it
Friend says:i am allowed to
Gary says:before or after this person died?
Gary says:but you are not a doctor or nurse
Friend says:before
Gary says:i mean, that's kind of messed up 
Gary says:don't you think?
Friend says:why?
Gary says:if i were on the operating table getting heart surgery done
Gary says:i wouldn't want someone who's not a doctor or nurse touching my heart
Friend says:touching the heart is part of the surgery
Gary says:i mean, were you helping with the surgery or just there to learn?
Friend says:learning and helping
Friend says:how else do you teach a doctor?
Gary says:i thought you had to be in residency or something like that
Friend says:in US, yes
Gary says:i mean, you are not even in med school
Friend says:in China, it is whoever the chief doctor allows
Gary says:and that's why it's screwed up
Friend says:i see your point
Friend says:the young man passed away due to something totally unrelated to his heart
Gary says:i know, but still
Friend says:i used to yell at him when he was alive
Gary says:it seems kinda unethical
Gary says:to me
Friend says:touching the heart is the most gental thing compare to other things done in a surgery
Gary says:you there?
Friend says:yeah
Friend says:had some internet problems
Gary says:i guess i'm just having a hard time processing this
Friend says:google some open heart surgery videos
Friend says:compare to poking, cutting the heart
Friend says:touching has no harm whatsoever
Gary says:no, it's not about WHAT'S being done
Gary says:it's about WHO is doing it
Friend says:i see
Gary says:so in china, the chief surgeon can let ANYONE inside the surgery room and just poke at the patient's random organs?
Friend says:no
Friend says:you can't poke
Gary says:that's a relief 
Friend says:i watched many surgeries with him
Friend says:and touching is not for fun, it is part of the surgery
Gary says:yeah, of course i know that
Gary says:are there other observers like you?
Friend says:not everyday, once a while some nurses came
Friend says:i am there everyday
Gary says:i mean, i'm not trying to make you feel bad
Gary says:it just blows my mind 
Friend says:i know
Gary says:do you see my point?
Friend says:i do
Gary says:how do you know the chief surgeon?
Friend says:wait until i tell you the story of how they use newspaper to wrap surgerical tools
Friend says:not at this hospital,
Friend says:my father knows him
Friend says:i was only expecting watching the surgeries
Friend says:but, slowly he told me to participate
Gary says:man, in the US he would get his ass sued
Gary says:that's just crazy
Friend says:his death rate is 1%, so pretty good
Gary says:but still
Friend says:we have 5 to 6 surgiers a day, 1000 some a year
Gary says:so how do you participate beside watching and feeling people's organs?
Friend says:i suture at the very end
Gary says:wow
Friend says:i did it many times on pig skins
Friend says:i can suture better than most chinese med school graduates
Gary says:i'm just surprised that you are allowed to do that without having an MD
Friend says:i am surprised, too
Friend says:but, not as much as you. maybe

Comments [0]

Awesome song

  

Just heard this beautiful song from the Synecdoche, NY soundtrack yesterday.

Comments [0]

Guide

Comments [0]

Test

   

Comments [0]

Bacon: the Other White Heat | Popular Science

A PopSci Collaboration with Boing Boing Video

Holy crap!

Comments [0]

Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world


Begin forwarded message:

From: Yan
Subject: Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world

Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world

By Nassim Nicholas Taleb

Published: April 7 2009 20:02 | Last updated: April 7 2009 20:02

1. What is fragile should break early while it is still small. Nothing should ever become too big to fail. Evolution in economic life helps those with the maximum amount of hidden risks – and hence the most fragile – become the biggest.

2. No socialisation of losses and privatisation of gains. Whatever may need to be bailed out should be nationalised; whatever does not need a bail-out should be free, small and risk-bearing. We have managed to combine the worst of capitalism and socialism. In France in the 1980s, the socialists took over the banks. In the US in the 2000s, the banks took over the government. This is surreal.

3. People who were driving a school bus blindfolded (and crashed it) should never be given a new bus. The economics establishment (universities, regulators, central bankers, government officials, various organisations staffed with economists) lost its legitimacy with the failure of the system. It is irresponsible and foolish to put our trust in the ability of such experts to get us out of this mess. Instead, find the smart people whose hands are clean.

4. Do not let someone making an “incentive” bonus manage a nuclear plant – or your financial risks. Odds are he would cut every corner on safety to show “profits” while claiming to be “conservative”. Bonuses do not accommodate the hidden risks of blow-ups. It is the asymmetry of the bonus system that got us here. No incentives without disincentives: capitalism is about rewards and punishments, not just rewards.

5. Counter-balance complexity with simplicity. Complexity from globalisation and highly networked economic life needs to be countered by simplicity in financial products. The complex economy is already a form of leverage: the leverage of efficiency. Such systems survive thanks to slack and redundancy; adding debt produces wild and dangerous gyrations and leaves no room for error. Capitalism cannot avoid fads and bubbles: equity bubbles (as in 2000) have proved to be mild; debt bubbles are vicious.

6. Do not give children sticks of dynamite, even if they come with a warning . Complex derivatives need to be banned because nobody understands them and few are rational enough to know it. Citizens must be protected from themselves, from bankers selling them “hedging” products, and from gullible regulators who listen to economic theorists.

7. Only Ponzi schemes should depend on confidence. Governments should never need to “restore confidence”. Cascading rumours are a product of complex systems. Governments cannot stop the rumours. Simply, we need to be in a position to shrug off rumours, be robust in the face of them.

8. Do not give an addict more drugs if he has withdrawal pains. Using leverage to cure the problems of too much leverage is not homeopathy, it is denial. The debt crisis is not a temporary problem, it is a structural one. We need rehab.

9. Citizens should not depend on financial assets or fallible “expert” advice for their retirement. Economic life should be definancialised. We should learn not to use markets as storehouses of value: they do not harbour the certainties that normal citizens require. Citizens should experience anxiety about their own businesses (which they control), not their investments (which they do not control).

10. Make an omelette with the broken eggs. Finally, this crisis cannot be fixed with makeshift repairs, no more than a boat with a rotten hull can be fixed with ad-hoc patches. We need to rebuild the hull with new (stronger) materials; we will have to remake the system before it does so itself. Let us move voluntarily into Capitalism 2.0 by helping what needs to be broken break on its own, converting debt into equity, marginalising the economics and business school establishments, shutting down the “Nobel” in economics, banning leveraged buyouts, putting bankers where they belong, clawing back the bonuses of those who got us here, and teaching people to navigate a world with fewer certainties.

Then we will see an economic life closer to our biological environment: smaller companies, richer ecology, no leverage. A world in which entrepreneurs, not bankers, take the risks and companies are born and die every day without making the news.

In other words, a place more resistant to black swans.

The writer is a veteran trader, a distinguished professor at New York University’s Polytechnic Institute and the author of The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable

 

Comments [0]